Are Short-Term Plans Bad for Consumers, Individual Market?

A new report prepared for the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society by actuarial firm Milliman Inc. concludes that short-term limited-duration (STLD) health plans expose enrollees to substantial financial risk, and that widespread enrollment in STLD plans by consumers would drive up premium costs. But some health policy experts tell AIS Health that, while STLD plans are undoubtedly a riskier proposition for consumers than more robust insurance, their impact on the broader marketplace is not clear.

In August 2018, the Trump administration issued a final rule that loosened the regulations governing STLD plans, allowing them to cover individuals for up to 364 days and be renewed up to 36 months. When the ACA was enacted, STLD plans were initially meant only to serve as stopgap coverage for consumers who lost coverage unexpectedly but didn’t qualify for a special enrollment period, so the Obama administration allowed the plans to last only three months.

0 Comments
© 2022 MMIT
Peter Johnson

Peter Johnson

Peter has been a reporter for nearly a decade. Before joining AIS Health, Peter covered a wide variety of topics in his hometown of Seattle, where he continues to live. Peter’s work has appeared in publications including The Atlantic and The Stranger. Peter attended Colby College.

Related Posts

golden-gate-bridge
September 23

West Coast Public Sector Plan Sponsors Will Coordinate More Closely Through Purchaser Group

READ MORE
remote-patient-monitoring-and-phone
September 23

Spike in Remote Patient Monitoring During Pandemic Is Driven by a Fraction of Providers

READ MORE
humana-headquarter
September 23

Humana Will Buy One Primary Care Group — and Could Snap Up Another

READ MORE

GAIN THERAPEUTIC AREA-SPECIFIC INTEL TO DRIVE ACCESS FOR YOUR BRAND

Sign up for publications to get unmatched business intelligence delivered to your inbox.

subscribe today