Experts Discuss Pros, Cons of Risk-Based Payment in Primary Care

As transactions and outside investment in primary care become more common, many health care insiders see an opportunity to shift primary care reimbursement toward risk-based payment — but experts warn that value-based contracting can’t solve all of primary care’s problems on its own.

Primary care practices (PCPs) operating on a fee-for-service basis faced a crisis in 2020, when the pandemic discouraged patients from making routine visits to the doctor’s office. Many PCPs turned to outside financing to fund capital investments or make payroll. Others combined horizontally with other PCPs or sold to health systems.

0 Comments
© 2022 MMIT
Peter Johnson

Peter Johnson

Peter has been a reporter for nearly a decade. Before joining AIS Health, Peter covered a wide variety of topics in his hometown of Seattle, where he continues to live. Peter’s work has appeared in publications including The Atlantic and The Stranger. Peter attended Colby College.

Related Posts

businessman-with-report-chart-up-forward-to-financial-profit-growth-of-stock-market-investment
October 15

Consolidation in Payer, Provider Markets Continues to Rise

READ MORE
post-default-image
February 19

Pandemic Exposes Need for Alternate Primary Care Payment

Read More
post-default-image
July 13

Insurers Outline How They’re Helping PCPs Stay Afloat

Read More

GAIN THERAPEUTIC AREA-SPECIFIC INTEL TO DRIVE ACCESS FOR YOUR BRAND

Sign up for publications to get unmatched business intelligence delivered to your inbox.

subscribe today