How Would a Public Option or a Capped Rate Policy Impact Private Insurance Markets?

by Jinghong Chen
Introducing a public option or a capped rate policy — both of which would limit the amount that commercial insurers reimburse providers — into the nongroup or both the nongroup and group markets could significantly reduce premiums, the number of uninsured and health care spending, according to a series of research from the Urban Institute. By analyzing various models, the report shows that limiting the reforms to nongroup markets where either insurers or hospitals or both are concentrated would increase coverage and reduce spending almost as much as applying them nationwide. As demonstrated in a case study on two California markets, both the public option and capped rate policy would reduce monthly premium costs for consumers.

0 Comments
© 2024 MMIT
Jinghong Chen

Jinghong Chen Reporter

Jinghong produces infographics and data stories on health insurance and specialty pharmacy for AIS Health. She graduated from Missouri School of Journalism with a focus on data journalism and international reporting. Before joining AIS in 2018, she worked at WBEZ, Al Jazeera English and The New York Times Chinese.

Related Posts

uhc-building
April 19

UnitedHealth — Mostly — Calms Jittery Analysts With 1Q Earnings Report

READ MORE
stock-ticker
April 19

Elevance Again Beats Utilization Blues, Launches Primary Care PE Deal

READ MORE
businessman-viewing-news-update-journalism-headline-on-a-laptop
April 19

News Briefs: Politicians Probe Change Cyberattack

READ MORE

GAIN THERAPEUTIC AREA-SPECIFIC INTEL TO DRIVE ACCESS FOR YOUR BRAND

Sign up for publications to get unmatched business intelligence delivered to your inbox.

subscribe today