How Would a Public Option or a Capped Rate Policy Impact Private Insurance Markets?

by Jinghong Chen
Introducing a public option or a capped rate policy — both of which would limit the amount that commercial insurers reimburse providers — into the nongroup or both the nongroup and group markets could significantly reduce premiums, the number of uninsured and health care spending, according to a series of research from the Urban Institute. By analyzing various models, the report shows that limiting the reforms to nongroup markets where either insurers or hospitals or both are concentrated would increase coverage and reduce spending almost as much as applying them nationwide. As demonstrated in a case study on two California markets, both the public option and capped rate policy would reduce monthly premium costs for consumers.

0 Comments
© 2022 MMIT
Jinghong Chen

Jinghong Chen Reporter

Jinghong produces infographics and data stories on health insurance and specialty pharmacy for AIS Health. She graduated from Missouri School of Journalism with a focus on data journalism and international reporting. Before joining AIS in 2018, she worked at WBEZ, Al Jazeera English and The New York Times Chinese.

Related Posts

person-holding-a-pencil
September 30

Medicaid Plans Aren’t Properly Reporting MLR Data, OIG Finds

READ MORE
stethoscope-bill-and-pills
September 30

How Would Adjusting the Marketplace Coverage Benchmark to a Gold Plan Affect Affordability?

READ MORE
department-of-justice-building
September 30

Loss in UnitedHealth/Change Trial May Not Lower DOJ’s Deal-Blocking Appetite

READ MORE

GAIN THERAPEUTIC AREA-SPECIFIC INTEL TO DRIVE ACCESS FOR YOUR BRAND

Sign up for publications to get unmatched business intelligence delivered to your inbox.

subscribe today