Ruling on Transgender Care May Have Major Impact on Third-Party Administrators

A district court judge in Washington state ruled on Dec. 19 that Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Illinois violated the anti-discrimination provision of the Affordable Care Act when it served as a third-party administrator (TPA) of health benefits and refused to cover medically necessary gender-affirming care for a transgender boy.

The decision “is something that could have a big impact on administrators” of health benefits, David Kaufman, an attorney with Laurus Law Group LLC, tells AIS Health, a division of MMIT. It came one month after the court certified the case as a class-action lawsuit, meaning other individuals who had their gender-affirming care denied could potentially be involved, “so the case probably has a long way to go before it’s settled law,” according to Kaufman.

0 Comments
© 2024 MMIT
Tim Casey

Tim Casey

Tim has worked as a reporter and editor for more than 20 years. Before joining AIS Health in December 2021, he was a business reporter covering the commercial real estate industry’s capital markets for four years. He previously covered health care business issues for two medical publishing companies and high school, college and professional sports for the Sacramento Bee newspaper. Tim has a B.A. in Psychology from the University of Notre Dame and an M.B.A. from Georgetown University.

Related Posts

charts-on-laptop-screen
October 7

AHIP Asks Feds to Table Proposal Aimed at Curtailing Biased Algorithms

READ MORE
health-insurance
August 5

Morgan Health Study Flags Disparities in Employer-Sponsored Insurance

READ MORE
post-default-image
July 16

HHS Sets Data Standards for Gender Identity, Sexual Orientation

Read More

GAIN THERAPEUTIC AREA-SPECIFIC INTEL TO DRIVE ACCESS FOR YOUR BRAND

Sign up for publications to get unmatched business intelligence delivered to your inbox.

subscribe today