Benefit Management

According to a new report, retail clinic claims have boomed since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic — and heavy utilization seems like it’s here to stay. Experts tell AIS Health, a division of MMIT, that retail clinics can help improve access and convenience for patients, but they also caution that retail clinics aren’t a substitute for high-quality primary care and could induce demand for low-value encounters.

The report, prepared by health care consultancy Definitive Healthcare LLC, found that retail clinic claim volume increased by 200% between 2017 and 2022, according to information sourced from the firm’s proprietary all-payer claims database. During the same period, urgent care claims increased by 70%, emergency room claims decreased by 1%, and primary care physician claims decreased by 13%.

In recent months, the interest in prescription weight loss medications has grown exponentially as celebrities tout the drugs and clinical trial results show their safety and effectiveness. However, while tens of millions of people could benefit from the medications, health policy experts tell AIS Health that payers are taking a cautious approach and are concerned at the financial impact if the FDA approves more drugs for that indication, as is expected.

A recent survey from the International Foundation of Employee Benefit Plans found that 22.1% of employers last year offered prescription drug coverage for weight loss, including 21.3% of corporations, 22% of public employers and 27% of multiemployer plans. Of the 470 companies that responded to the survey, 25% said obesity is one of the top three health conditions that has the largest impact on overall health costs.

In a new regulation released on May 23, the Biden administration proposed increasing drug price transparency reporting by PBMs and pharmaceutical manufacturers supplying Medicaid — and requiring Medicaid managed care organizations to remove pharmacy benefit administration costs from medical loss ratio (MLR) reporting. Experts say the proposed rule is a marginal but meaningful step forward in prescription drug cost containment, but they add that the proposed rule won’t do as much as bills under serious discussion in Congress to rein in controversial PBM business practices such as spread pricing.

The proposed rule, which CMS says in a fact sheet “implement[s] new statutory authorities included in the Medicaid Services Investment and Accountability Act of 2019,” is meant to improve the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program by “proposing new policies that would assure greater consistency and accuracy of drug information reporting, strengthened data collection, and efficient operation of the MDRP.” Per the fact sheet, notable elements of the regulation include:

Alternate funding companies that carve out specialty drugs and then get funding for patients via manufacturers’ patient assistance programs (PAPs) have existed for several years, and pharma manufacturers have long complained about them. And although a few have begun restricting who can access their PAPs, that was the extent of the response — until now. On May 5, AbbVie Inc. filed a lawsuit (1:23-cv-02836) against Payer Matrix, LLC in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Eastern Division over its “fraudulent and deceptive scheme to enrich itself by exploiting AbbVie’s PAP through the enrollment of insured patients into a charitable program not intended for them.”

AbbVie states that it is “bring[ing] this action to stop Payer Matrix’s harmful conduct and protect its program so it can continue to serve its intended purpose — providing free drugs to uninsured and underinsured patients who otherwise could not afford their AbbVie medicine.”

The FDA recently expanded the patient population for Novo Nordisk’s Sogroya (somapacitan-beco), a long-acting growth hormone requiring weekly administration, as opposed to daily administration of short-acting agents. Payers and endocrinologists have expressed a willingness to manage and prescribe the new agents, according to Zitter Insights.

On April 28, the FDA expanded the patient population for Sogroya to include the treatment of people at least 2 1/2 years old who have growth failure due to inadequate secretion of endogenous growth hormone. The agency initially approved the drug on Aug. 28, 2020, for the replacement of growth hormone in adults with growth hormone deficiency. With the newest approval, the therapy becomes the first and only once-weekly growth hormone treatment for both children and adults.

On May 5, AbbVie Inc. filed a lawsuit (1:23-cv-02836) against Payer Matrix, LLC in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Eastern Division over its “fraudulent and deceptive scheme to enrich itself by exploiting AbbVie’s PAP [patient assistance program] through the enrollment of insured patients into a charitable program not intended for them.” Payer Matrix tells AIS Health, a division of MMIT, that it “vehemently dispute[s] the allegations.”

Prior to the filing and shortly before AbbVie updated its PAP language earlier this year, AIS Health conducted an interview with Michael Jordan, Payer Matrix’s chief business officer (CBO), to learn more about the company’s practices.

As more employers shifted to self-funded health plans, the stop-loss insurance segment expanded to $26 billion in 2021, with a growth rate exceeding 10% in each of the past five years, according to an A.M. Best report. There has been a notable uptick in employers with fewer than 1,000 employees choosing stop-loss insurance since 2018. Although the medical loss ratio for stop-loss has been lower than for group commercial coverage over recent years, it rose from 81.5% in 2020 to 85.0% in 2021, largely due to a year-over-year increase in stop-loss claims from major insurers and several other insurers that had claims for the first time in 2021.

With premiums steadily rising and turbulence shaking up the market-share leaderboard, the stop-loss insurance segment has become integral to many health plans’ portfolios in recent years. Experts believe the level of competition will only grow as more employers transition to self-funded plans.

Net premiums earned (NPE) for stop-loss insurance, an additional layer of coverage that protects employers against extremely high-dollar claims, reached $26 billion in 2021, according to a new report from credit rating firm A.M. Best. That’s up from $24 billion in NPE in 2020 — and more than double the $11.6 billion in total NPE seven years earlier in 2014.

Issues around so-called alternate funding companies that carve out specialty drugs have existed for several years now, but only recently has a manufacturer taken legal action against such a company. On May 5, AbbVie Inc. filed a lawsuit (1:23-cv-02836) against Payer Matrix, LLC in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Eastern Division over its “fraudulent and deceptive scheme to enrich itself by exploiting AbbVie’s PAP [patient assistance program] through the enrollment of insured patients into a charitable program not intended for them.”

AbbVie states that it is “bring[ing] this action to stop Payer Matrix’s harmful conduct and protect its program so it can continue to serve its intended purpose — providing free drugs to uninsured and underinsured patients who otherwise could not afford their AbbVie medicine.”

On May 5, AbbVie Inc. filed a lawsuit (1:23-cv-02836) against Payer Matrix, LLC in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Eastern Division over its “fraudulent and deceptive scheme to enrich itself by exploiting AbbVie’s PAP [patient assistance program] through the enrollment of insured patients into a charitable program not intended for them.”

Payer Matrix was not able to provide a comment on the lawsuit by press time. But prior to the filing and shortly before AbbVie updated its PAP language earlier this year, AIS Health, a division of MMIT, conducted an interview with Michael Jordan, Payer Matrix’s chief business officer (CBO), to learn more about the company’s practices.