Market access

A review of market access for treatments for adults with growth hormone deficiency shows that under the pharmacy benefit, about 52% of the lives under commercial formularies are covered with utilization management restrictions. Around 59% of the lives under Medicare formularies are not covered for at least one of the drugs.

Large numbers of Medicare beneficiaries who are ineligible for low-income subsidies and have been prescribed high-price prescription drugs for conditions such as cancer don’t initiate their treatment, likely because they can’t afford it, according to new research published in Health Affairs. One of the study’s authors tells AIS Health that severe illness is a possible outcome of noninitiation in the studied clinical areas and adds that proposals under consideration in Congress to cap out-of-pocket spending for Medicare beneficiaries would make a big difference to the affected patients.

According to the paper, “among beneficiaries without subsidies, we observed noninitiation for 30 percent of prescriptions written for anticancer drugs, 22 percent for hepatitis C treatments, and more than 50 percent for disease-modifying therapies for either immune system disorders or hypercholesterolemia.”

A review of market access for seizure emergency treatments shows that under the pharmacy benefit, about 35% of the lives under commercial formularies are covered with utilization management restrictions. Around 17% of the lives under health exchange formularies are not covered for at least one of the drugs.

In a move derided by some health care stakeholders and applauded by others — including private payers — CMS on April 7 finalized its National Coverage Determination (NCD) for an Alzheimer’s treatment that has been steeped in controversy since it received accelerated approval last June.

The final coverage decision largely affirmed what CMS had proposed in its draft NCD: Medicare will cover Biogen Inc.’s Aduhelm (aducanumab) only for patients enrolled in randomized, controlled clinical trials conducted either through the FDA or the National Institutes of Health. Patients also must have a clinical diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer’s disease or mild dementia with a confirmed presence of plaque on the brain.

Large numbers of Medicare beneficiaries who are ineligible for low-income subsidies and have been prescribed high-price prescription drugs for conditions such as cancer don’t initiate their treatment, likely because they can’t afford it, according to new research published in Health Affairs. One of the study’s authors tells AIS Health that severe illness is a possible outcome of noninitiation in the studied clinical areas and adds that proposals under consideration in Congress to cap out-of-pocket spending for Medicare beneficiaries would make a big difference to the affected patients.

According to the paper, “among beneficiaries without subsidies, we observed noninitiation for 30 percent of prescriptions written for anticancer drugs, 22 percent for hepatitis C treatments, and more than 50 percent for disease-modifying therapies for either immune system disorders or hypercholesterolemia.”

A review of market access for treatments of adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) shows that under the pharmacy benefit, about 68% of the lives under commercial formularies are covered with utilization management restrictions. Around 7% of the lives under Medicare formularies are not covered for at least one of the drugs.

The FDA’s accelerated approval of Alzheimer’s drug Aduhelm (aducanumab) last year was extremely controversial, prompting harsh criticism and calls for reform of the accelerated approval process itself. Congress has taken up the issue and is considering one bill from each major party that would revamp the process in the hope of addressing concerns that the pathway has allowed flawed drugs to stay on the market without being revisited.

Medical research and health care policy experts have raised a number of critiques of the current accelerated approval framework. Two critiques stand out: The first concerns the quality of data used in measuring the effectiveness of accelerated approval drugs. After a drug is granted accelerated approval, the FDA mandates that the drug be evaluated using confirmatory clinical trials. Experts have criticized the quality of data collected for accelerated approval drugs; in particular, the measurements used to gain approval for Aduhelm were heavily criticized by clinicians.

A review of market access for treatments of adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) shows that under the pharmacy benefit, about 13% of the lives under commercial formularies are covered with utilization management restrictions. Around 29% of the lives under Medicare formularies are not covered for at least one of the drugs.

A review of market access for treatments of adults with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) shows that under the pharmacy benefit, about 65% of the lives under commercial formularies are covered with utilization management restrictions. Around 45% of the lives under Medicare formularies are not covered for at least one of the drugs.

The FDA’s accelerated approval of Alzheimer’s drug Aduhelm (aducanumab) last year was extremely controversial, prompting harsh criticism and calls for reform of the accelerated approval process itself. Congress has taken up the issue and is considering one bill from each major party that would revamp the process in the hope of addressing concerns that the pathway has allowed flawed drugs to stay on the market without being revisited.

Medical research and health care policy experts have raised a number of critiques of the current accelerated approval framework. Two critiques stand out: The first concerns the quality of data used in measuring the effectiveness of accelerated approval drugs. After a drug is granted accelerated approval, the FDA mandates that the drug be evaluated using confirmatory clinical trials. Experts have criticized the quality of data collected for accelerated approval drugs; in particular, the measurements used to gain approval for Aduhelm were heavily criticized by clinicians.