PBMs/Pharmacy Benefit Managers

With Donald Trump set to be the 47th president and Republicans in control of both chambers of Congress, 2025 is shaping up to be a year in which the GOP has enough political might to pass PBM reform — if it has the political will.

Yet two pharmaceutical industry trade groups do not appear to be counting on Republicans’ ability to quickly prioritize a health care issue. Instead, the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA) and the National Association of Manufacturers (NAM) are both launching ad blitzes aimed at pressing Congress to target PBMs before the year is over.

All of the Big Three PBMs have added private-label subsidiaries into their fold that are working closely with some manufacturers. And while industry experts say that the companies offer certain benefits to the U.S. health care system overall, questions about them remain. Still, the entities could offer benefits to their pharma partners, including better formulary positioning and potentially even moving away from rebates.

Two of the companies, both based in Ireland, seem to be mainly, if not exclusively, focused on biosimilars, starting with those of AbbVie Inc.’s best-selling Humira (adalimumab).

Editor's Note: This article has been updated to include a statement from Glenview Capital.

In a development that drew mixed reactions from analysts, CVS Health Corp. is reportedly considering breaking up its diversified health care enterprise due to the poor performance of its Aetna health benefits division.

The news of CVS’s deliberations on the company’s future — reported by multiple outlets citing anonymous sources — came shortly after a hedge fund investor, Glenview Capital, reportedly met with CVS executives to offer ideas about turning the company around. However, Glenview Capital then denied that it as pushing for a breakup of CVS.

The last of the so-called Big Three PBMs recently joined the others in offering a new private-label subsidiary when it unveiled upcoming changes to its commercial formularies. Those units, which are largely focused on biosimilars and generics, may offer benefits to pharma companies partnering with them, but such arrangements also pose potential risks as the offerings are already drawing scrutiny.

On Jan. 1, 2025, UnitedHealth Group’s Optum Rx will place Nuvaila-labeled biosimilars of Stelara (ustekinumab) from Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine and AbbVie Inc.’s Humira (adalimumab) on various tiers of three of its commercial formularies for a zero-dollar copay. In partnership with Amgen Inc. for its interchangeable Wezlana (ustekinumab-auub), Wezlana for Nuvaila will be available in both high-wholesale acquisition cost and low-WAC versions.

Overall satisfaction with PBMs is at a decade-long low this year, according to the 2024 Pharmacy Benefit Manager Customer Satisfaction Report, published by Pharmaceutical Strategies Group, an EPIC company. The report also showed that payers were seeking improvements in the PBM industry and were willing to be part of the disruptive change.

The report is based on responses from 248 benefits leaders at employers, unions/Taft-Hartley plans, health plans, and health systems, and it was conducted from May 10, 2024, through June 7, 2024.

Overall satisfaction with PBMs is at a decade-long low this year, according to the 2024 Pharmacy Benefit Manager Customer Satisfaction Report, published by Pharmaceutical Strategies Group, an EPIC company. The report also showed that payers were seeking improvements in the PBM industry and were willing to be part of the disruptive change.

The report is based on responses from 248 benefits leaders at employers, unions/Taft-Hartley plans, health plans, and health systems, and it was conducted from May 10, 2024, through June 7, 2024.

When the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) officially accused the three largest PBMs of artificially inflating insulin prices, it marked the latest move in what has become a protracted effort by federal regulators to rein in the industry’s business practices.

However, experts who spoke to AIS Health say it’s unclear how much of an impact the FTC-driven litigation will have on the market — or whether the complaint itself will survive once the White House gains a new occupant.

Even if the FTC’s lawsuit is “robustly successful,” says Joe Shields, managing director of Transparency-Rx, it is focused on only one drug category. “That’s not meant as a criticism, but the reality is, what that means to the broader aspects of formulary or pharmacy benefit management, it’s an open-ended question,” adds Shields, whose organization of smaller PBMs is pushing for industry reform.

Employers and health plans are less satisfied with the “Big Three” PBMs — CVS Health Corp.’s Caremark, UnitedHealth Group’s Optum Rx and The Cigna Group’s Express Scripts — compared with their smaller peers in the pharmacy benefits industry, according to a Pharmaceutical Strategies Group (PSG) survey published this month. While the Big Three have taken steps in recent months to offer more transparent models, Michael Lonergan, PSG’s president, tells AIS Health those companies have faced numerous challenges to their businesses that have made them more unpopular among clients.

For instance, he mentions the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) lawsuit filed on Sept. 20 against the Big Three PBMs and their affiliated group purchasing organizations (GPOs), accusing them of inflating the list price of insulin medications and restricting access to those drugs. The FTC also issued an interim report in July that was highly critical of the Big Three, which together account for about 80% of the U.S. prescription drug claim processing market.

Just days after The Cigna Group’s Express Scripts sued the Federal Trade Commission over an interim report that criticized PBMs, the FTC revealed that it is suing Express Scripts, UnitedHealth Group’s Optum Rx, and CVS Health Corp.’s Caremark for “artificially inflating” insulin prices.

The FTC said its administrative complaint also names the “Big Three” PBMs’ affiliated group purchasing organizations that serve as prescription drug rebate aggregators: CVS’s Zinc Health Services, Cigna’s Ascent Health Services, and UnitedHealth’s Emisar Pharma Services.

The FTC alleges that the three PBMs, which together processing 80% of all prescription drug claims, “created a perverse drug rebate system that prioritizes high rebates from drug manufacturers, leading to artificially inflated insulin list prices.”

Ahead of the much-anticipated launch of the next wave of biosimilars for a high-cost specialty drug, The Cigna Group’s Evernorth Health Services has said that it will roll out a program to manage the drugs that is similar to one it first began offering this summer. But several aspects of the upcoming launch remain unclear, including whether the discount provided for the new drug will be available to all payers.

Evernorth revealed on Sept. 5 that it will offer an interchangeable biosimilar of Stelara (ustekinumab) from Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine for $0 for “eligible patients” of Accredo starting “early next year.” The agent will be produced by Quallent Pharmaceuticals, Cigna’s private-label subsidiary.

The new agent’s price will be more than 80% less than Stelara’s list price. “For many employers, unions, municipalities and other health plan sponsors that choose to work with Accredo as part of their specialty pharmacy network offering, this represents an opportunity for significant savings,” said Evernorth in a press release.